NEW YORK, June 8 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: KERX) today reported final results on the clinical activity of KRX-0401 (perifosine), the Company’s oral anti-cancer agent that inhibits Akt activation in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda®) as a treatment for advanced, metastatic colorectal cancer. Abstract #3531, entitled, “Final results of a randomized phase II study of perifosine in combination with capecitabine (P-CAP) versus capecitabine plus placebo (CAP) in patients with second- or third-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC),” is being presented today in a poster discussion held during the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Chicago.
STUDY DESIGN:
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 11 centers across the United States, heavily pre-treated patients with second- or third-line metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive capecitabine (a chemotherapy used in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer which is marketed by Roche as Xeloda®) at 825 mg/m2 BID (total daily dose of 1650 mg/m2) on days 1 14 every 21 days plus either perifosine or placebo at 50 mg daily. The study enrolled a total of 38 patients, 34 of which were third-line or greater. Median age of patients was 65 (32-83); 61% of the patients were male. Of the 38 patients enrolled, 35 patients were evaluable for response (20 patients on the perifosine + capecitabine arm and 15 patients on the placebo + capecitabine arm). Three patients on the placebo + capecitabine arm were not evaluable for response (2 patients were inevaluable due to toxicity (days 14, 46) and 1 was inevaluable due to a new malignancy on day 6). All patients in the perifosine + capecitabine arm were evaluable for response.
The patients in the study were heavily pre-treated, with the arms well-balanced in terms of prior treatment regimens. The prior treatment regimens for all 38 patients are shown in the table below. Notably, all of the patients (with the exception of one CAP arm patient) had been treated with FOLFIRI and/or FOLFOX, almost 80% treated with Avastin®, and half treated with an EGFR antibody:
Prior RX | P-CAP (n=20) | CAP (n=18) | All Patients (n=38) | |
FOLFIRI | 18 (90%) | 16 (89%) | 34 (89%) | |
FOLFOX | 15 (75%) | 13 (72%) | 28 (74%) | |
FOLFIRI & FOLFOX | 13 (65%) | 12 (67%) | 25 (66%) | |
Avastin® | 15 (75%) | 15 (83%) | 30 (79%) | |
EGFR Antibody (1) | 9 (45%) | 10 (56%) | 19 (50%) | |
5-FU Refractory Status | 14 (70%) | 13 (72%) | 27 (71%) | |
Third Line or > | 18 (90%) | 16 (89%) | 34 (89%) | |
(1) Prior treatment with Erbitux® and/or Vectibix® | ||||
The primary endpoint of this study was to measure Time to Progression (TTP). Overall Response Rate (ORR), defined as Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) by RECIST, and Overall Survival (OS) were measured as secondary endpoints.
STUDY RESULTS:
The P-CAP arm demonstrated a statistically significant advantage for TTP and OS, as well as for the percentage of patients achieving Stable Disease (SD) or better lasting 12 or more weeks, as compared to the CAP arm. The P-CAP arm demonstrated a greater than 60% improvement in OS, a more than doubling of median TTP, and almost a doubling of the percentage of patients achieving SD or better. In addition, the ORR was 20% (including one CR, and durable responses) in the P-CAP arm versus 7% in the CAP arm.
The final efficacy results are as follows:
ALL EVALUABLE PATIENTS (n=35):
Group | n | CR n (%) | PR n (%) | Duration of Response | > SD (min 12 wks) n (%) p=0.036 | PD< 12 wks n (%) | Median TTP Wks p=0.0012 | Median OS* Months p=0.0161 | |
P-CAP | 20 | 1 (5%) | 3 (15%) | CR: 36 m | 11 (55%) | 5 (25%) | 28 [95% CI (12-48)] | 17.7 [95% CI (8.5-24.6)] | |
PR: 21, 19, 11 m | |||||||||
CAP | 15 | 0 | 1 (7%) | PR: 7 m | 5 (33%) | 9 (60%) | 11 [95% CI (9-15.9)] | 10.9 [95% CI (5-16.9)] | |
*Survival is calculated from date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, whether or not additional therapies were received after removal from treatment.
Of notable interest were the patients who were previously refractory to a 5-FU based regimen. The P-CAP arm again demonstrated a statistically significant increase in both TTP and OS compared to the CAP arm. The final data is illustrated below:
5-FU REFRACTORY PATIENTS (n=25):
Group | n (%) | PR n (%) | Duration of Response | > SD (min 12 wks) n (%) p=0.066 | PD <12 wks n (%) |