PITTSBURGH—Learning a new skill is easier when it is related to an ability we already have. For example, a trained pianist can learn a new melody easier than learning how to hit a tennis serve.
Scientists from the Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (CNBC) — a joint program between Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh — have discovered a fundamental constraint in the brain that may explain why this happens. Published as the cover story in the Aug. 28, 2014, issue of Nature, they found for the first time that there are limitations on how adaptable the brain is during learning and that these restrictions are a key determinant for whether a new skill will be easy or difficult to learn. Understanding the ways in which the brain’s activity can be “flexed” during learning could eventually be used to develop better treatments for stroke and other brain injuries.
Lead author Patrick T. Sadtler, a Ph.D. candidate in Pitt’s Department of Bioengineering, compared the study’s findings to cooking.
“Suppose you have flour, sugar, baking soda, eggs, salt and milk. You can combine them to make different items - bread, pancakes and cookies — but it would be difficult to make hamburger patties with the existing ingredients,” Sadtler said. “We found that the brain works in a similar way during learning. We found that subjects were able to more readily recombine familiar activity patterns in new ways relative to creating entirely novel patterns.”
For the study, the research team trained animals to use a brain-computer interface (BCI), similar to ones that have shown recent promise in clinical trials for assisting quadriplegics and amputees.
“This evolving technology is a powerful tool for brain research,” said Daofen Chen, program director at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which supported this research. “It helps scientists study the dynamics of brain circuits that may explain the neural basis of learning.”
The researchers recorded neural activity in the subject’s motor cortex and directed the recordings into a computer, which translated the activity into movement of a cursor on the computer screen. This technique allowed the team to specify the activity patterns that would move the cursor. The test subjects’ goal was to move the cursor to targets on the screen, which required them to generate the patterns of neural activity that the experimenters had requested. If the subjects could move the cursor well, that meant that they had learned to generate the neural activity pattern that the researchers had specified.
The results showed that the subjects learned to generate some neural activity patterns more easily than others, since they only sometimes achieved accurate cursor movements. The harder-to-learn patterns were different from any of the pre-existing patterns, whereas the easier-to-learn patterns were combinations of pre-existing brain patterns. Because the existing brain patterns likely reflect how the neurons are interconnected, the results suggest that the connectivity among neurons shapes learning.
“We wanted to study how the brain changes its activity when you learn, and also how its activity cannot change. Cognitive flexibility has a limit — and we wanted to find out what that limit looks like in terms of neurons,” said Aaron P. Batista, assistant professor of bioengineering at Pitt.
Byron M. Yu, assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering and biomedical engineering at Carnegie Mellon, believes this work demonstrates the utility of BCI for basic scientific studies that will eventually impact people’s lives.
“These findings could be the basis for novel rehabilitation procedures for the many neural disorders that are characterized by improper neural activity,” Yu said. “Restoring function might require a person to generate a new pattern of neural activity. We could use techniques similar to what were used in this study to coach patients to generate proper neural activity.”
In addition to Sadtler, Batista and Yu, the research team included Pitt’s Kristin Quick and Elizabeth Tyler-Kabara; CMU’s Matthew Golub and Steven Chase; and Stephen Ryu of Stanford University and the Palo Alto Medical Foundation.
The CNBC is devoted to investigating the neural mechanisms that give rise to human cognitive abilities. The center integrates the strengths of the University of Pittsburgh in basic and clinical neuroscience with Carnegie Mellon’s strengths in psychology, computer science, biological sciences and statistics, and sponsors an interdisciplinary graduate training program. The CNBC will celebrate its 20th anniversary of advancing brain, computation and behavior through research and education this fall. For more information, visit http://www.cnbc.cmu.edu/.
The research was funded by the NIH, National Science Foundation and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
For more information on how the brain’s existing neural patterns show how learning can be difficult, watch the researchers discuss the study in this short video: http://youtu.be/9ihQkxtt6pM.
As the birthplace of artificial intelligence and cognitive psychology, Carnegie Mellon has been a leader in the study of brain and behavior for more than 50 years. The university has created some of the first cognitive tutors, helped to develop the Jeopardy-winning Watson, founded a ground-breaking doctoral program in neural computation, and completed cutting-edge work in understanding the genetics of autism. Building on its strengths in biology, computer science, psychology, statistics and engineering, CMU recently launched BrainHubSM, an global initiative that focuses on how the structure and activity of the brain give rise to complex behaviors.
Contacts:
Shilo Rea / Carnegie Mellon University / 412-268-6094 / shilo@cmu.edu
Paul Kovach / University of Pittsburgh / O: 412-624-0265 / C: 412-427-9422 / pkovach@pitt.edu
Hey, check out all the research scientist jobs. Post your resume today!
