Sanofi’s Anti-OX40 Blocker Falls ‘Well Below Expectations’ in Phase III Eczema Study

Sanofi's Distribution Center in Quebec, Canada

iStock, JHVEPhoto

Despite hitting its efficacy targets in the Phase III COAST-1 study, Sanofi’s amlitelimab remains “meaningfully inferior” to Dupixent, according to analysts at Leerink Partners.

Sanofi’s investigational OX40L blocker amlitelimab significantly eased skin lesions and disease severity in a Phase III study of atopic dermatitis—though the extent of its benefits has left analysts disappointed.

Writing to investors on Thursday morning, analysts at Leerink Partners noted that amlitelimab’s late-stage performance came “well below expectations.” In particular, its efficacy “was meaningfully inferior” to Dupixent, the blockbuster anti-inflammatory biologic developed by Sanofi and Regeneron, which the analysts considered as the “bar for compelling results.”

Thursday’s readout comes from the Phase III COAST-1 study, which tested amlitelimab against placebo in more than 600 patients 12 years and older with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. One of the study’s key endpoints is EASI-75, a variable that measures the proportion of patients reaching a 75% or greater improvement in the eczema area and severity index total score.

Results showed that at 24 weeks, a monthly subcutaneous dose of amlitelimab resulted in a 35.9% EASI-75, while an injection administered every 12 weeks elicited 39.1% EASI-75. Placebo counterparts, at this time point, saw 19.1% EASI-75. According to analysis by Leerink, these findings equal placebo-adjusted EASI-75 outcomes of roughly 17% and 20% for amlitelimab dosed every four and 12 weeks, respectively.

“These results . . . fall short of Dupixent’s Week 16 performance in the Ph3 SOLO trials, in which placebo-adjusted EASI-75 reached 32–34%,” the analysts wrote.

In their own note Thursday, analysts at William Blair agreed that “the magnitude of benefit with amlitelimab came in well below investor expectations . . . compared to approved benchmarks including Dupixent.”

These disappointing outcomes, “add to the evidence suggesting OX40 or OX40L targeting therapies do not drive deep responses as fast as the IL-13/4 class,” the analysts added. Assets that act on the OX40 pathway may instead be relegated to a “second-line biologic for patients not responding to IL-13/4 therapies,” they said.

William Blair specifically named Amgen’s rocatinlimab, also an OX40-targeting antibody, which in March this year demonstrated a 29.5% EASI-75 advantage over placebo at 24 weeks. In September 2024, another Phase III readout found a placebo-adjusted EASI-75 improvement of 19.1% for rocatinlimab. “The efficacy of both rocatinlimab and amlitelimab in Phase III studies has fallen short of Dupixent,” the analysts noted.

Beyond COAST-1, Sanofi is running other atopic dermatitis trials of amlitelimab across its OCEANA clinical development program, including SHORE, COAST-2, AQUA and ESTUARY. Data coming in 2026 from those trials will potentially support global regulatory submissions, as per the pharma’s Thursday announcement.

Tristan is an independent science writer based in Metro Manila, with more than eight years of experience writing about medicine, biotech and science. He can be reached at tristan.manalac@biospace.com, tristan@tristanmanalac.com or on LinkedIn.
MORE ON THIS TOPIC