BioSpace Collaborative

Academic/Biomedical Research
News & Jobs
Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Channel Medical Device and Diagnostics Channel Clinical Research Channel BioSpace Collaborative    Job Seekers:  Register | Login          Employers:  Register | Login  

Free Newsletters
My Subscriptions

News by Subject
News by Disease
News by Date
Search News
Post Your News

Job Seeker Login
Most Recent Jobs
Search Jobs
Post Resume
Career Fairs
Career Resources
For Employers

Regional News
US & Canada
  Biotech Bay
  Biotech Beach
  Pharm Country
  Bio NC
  Southern Pharm
  BioCanada East
  C2C Services & Suppliers™


Company Profiles

Research Store

Research Events
Post an Event
Real Estate
Business Opportunities

PLoS By Category | Recent PLoS Articles
Immunology - Infectious Diseases - Pediatrics and Child Health - Public Health and Epidemiology

Circumsporozoite-Specific T Cell Responses in Children Vaccinated with RTS,S/AS01E and Protection against P falciparum Clinical Malaria
Published: Thursday, October 06, 2011
Author: Ally Olotu et al.

by Ally Olotu, Philippe Moris, Jedidah Mwacharo, Johan Vekemans, Domtila Kimani, Michel Janssens, Oscar Kai, Erik Jongert, Marc Lievens, Amanda Leach, Tonya Villafana, Barbara Savarese, Kevin Marsh, Joe Cohen, Philip Bejon


RTS,S/AS01E is the lead candidate pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine. In Phase IIb field trials the safety profile was acceptable and the efficacy was 53% (95%CI 31%–72%) for protecting children against clinical malaria caused by P. falciparum. We studied CS-specific T cell responses in order to identify correlates of protection.

Methods and Findings

We used intracellular cytokine staining (for IL2, IFN?, and TNFa), ex-vivo ELISPOTs (IFN? and IL2) and IFN? cultured ELISPOT assays to characterize the CS-specific cellular responses in 407 children (5–17 months of age) in a phase IIb randomized controlled trial of RTS,S/AS01E (NCT00380393). RTS,S/ AS01E vaccinees had higher frequencies of CS-specific CD4+ T cells producing IFN?, TNFa or IL2 compared to control vaccinees. In a multivariable analysis TNFa+ CD4+ T cells were independently associated with a reduced risk for clinical malaria among RTS,S/AS01E vaccinees (HR?=?0.64, 95%CI 0.49–0.86, p?=?0.002). There was a non-significant tendency towards reduced risk among control vaccinees (HR?=?0.80, 95%CI 0.62–1.03, p?=?0.084), albeit with lower CS-specific T cell frequencies and higher rates of clinical malaria. When data from both RTS,S/AS01E vaccinees and control vaccinees were combined (with adjusting for vaccination group), the HR was 0.74 (95%CI 0.62–0.89, p?=?0.001). After a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (n-18), the finding was still significant at p?=?0.018. There was no significant correlation between cultured or ex vivo ELISPOT data and protection from clinical malaria. The combination of TNFa+ CD4+ T cells and anti-CS antibody statistically accounted for the protective effect of vaccination in a Cox regression model.


RTS,S/AS01E induces CS-specific Th1 T cell responses in young children living in a malaria endemic area. The combination of anti-CS antibody concentrations titers and CS-specific TNFa+ CD4+ T cells could account for the level of protection conferred by RTS,S/AS01E. The correlation between CS-specific TNFa+ CD4+ T cells and protection needs confirmation in other datasets.