by Veerle Kersemans, Bart Cornelissen, Rebekka Hueting, Matthew Tredwell, Kamila Hussien, Philip D. Allen, Nadia Falzone, Sally A. Hill, Jonathan R. Dilworth, Veronique Gouverneur, Ruth J. Muschel, Sean C. Smart
Preclinical imaging requires anaesthesia to reduce motion-related artefacts. For direct translational relevance, anaesthesia must not significantly alter experimental outcome. This study reports on the effects of both anaesthetic and carrier gas upon the uptake of [64Cu]-CuATSM, [99mTc]-HL91 and [18F]-FMISO in a preclinical model of tumor hypoxia. Methodology/Principal Findings
The effect of carrier gas and anaesthetic was studied in 6 groups of CaNT-bearing CBA mice using [64Cu]-CuATSM, [99mTc]-HL91 or [18F]-FMISO. Mice were anaesthetised with isoflurane in air, isoflurane in pure oxygen, with ketamine/xylazine or hypnorm/hypnovel whilst breathing air, or in the awake state whilst breathing air or pure oxygen. PET or SPECT imaging was performed after which the mice were killed for organ/tumor tracer quantitation. Tumor hypoxia was confirmed. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed for the different anaesthetic regimes. The results demonstrate marked influences on tumor uptake of both carrier gas and anaesthetic, and show differences between [99mTc]-HL91, [18F]-FMISO and [64Cu]-CuATSM. [99mTc]-HL91 tumor uptake was only altered significantly by administration of 100% oxygen. The latter was not the case for [18F]-FMISO and [64Cu]-CuATSM. Tumor-to-muscle ratio (TMR) for both compounds was reduced significantly when either oxygen or anaesthetics (isoflurane in air, ketamine/xylazine or hypnorm/hypnovel) were introduced. For [18F]-FMISO no further decrease was measured when both isoflurane and oxygen were administered, [64Cu]-CuATSM did show an additional significant decrease in TMR. When using the same anaesthetic regimes, the extent of TMR reduction was less pronounced for [64Cu]-CuATSM than for [18F]-FMISO (40–60% versus 70% reduction as compared to awake animals breathing air). Conclusions/Significance
The use of anaesthesia can have profound effects on the experimental outcome. More importantly, all tested anaesthetics reduced tumor-hypoxia uptake. Anaesthesia cannot be avoided in preclinical studies but great care has to be taken in preclinical models of hypoxia as anaesthesia effects cannot be generalised across applications, nor disease states.